ESMA Clarifies Tether USDt Custody and Transfers Under MiCA Regulations

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has provided crucial insights regarding the custody and transfer of stablecoins that do not align with the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). This clarification comes amidst significant regulatory scrutiny and confusion surrounding the compliance of various cryptocurrencies.

Impact of MiCA on Stablecoins

Despite the removal of certain tokens from trading platforms, Binance has announced its intention to continue supporting deposits and withdrawals of non-MiCA-compliant stablecoins, including Tether (USDt), following the delisting scheduled for March 31. According to ESMA, a pivotal regulatory authority in Europe, the act of providing custody and transfer services for stablecoins that do not meet MiCA standards does not infringe upon the new European cryptocurrency laws.

Understanding ESMA’s Position

“Under MiCA, custody and transfer services do not in themselves constitute an ‘offering to the public’ or ‘seeking admission to trading’ of non-compliant asset-reference tokens or e-money tokens,” stated a spokesperson for ESMA in a recent interview with Cointelegraph on March 4. This statement has significant implications for European crypto asset service providers (CASPs), as it delineates the boundaries of compliance under the new regulations.

Guidance for Crypto Asset Service Providers

While the ESMA has confirmed that deposits and withdrawals of non-MiCA-compliant stablecoins are permissible, it has urged CASPs to prioritize restricting services that facilitate the acquisition of such assets by January 17, 2025. This directive aims to ensure that CASPs do not inadvertently promote the trading of non-compliant tokens.

Referring to its guidance issued in January, the ESMA reiterated that CASPs are permitted to maintain “sell-only” services, or withdrawals, until March 31. This allowance is designed to provide investors with an opportunity to exit their positions before the full implementation of MiCA regulations. “Therefore, it is important that all CASPs carefully assess whether any of their services amount to an offer to the public under MiCA,” the agency emphasized.

Ongoing Confusion Over MiCA Compliance

ESMA’s confirmation that MiCA does not explicitly restrict USDt custody and transfers, while simultaneously advising CASPs to halt withdrawals after March 31, has contributed to the ongoing confusion regarding MiCA compliance. Juan Ignacio Ibañez, a member of the Technical Committee of the MiCA Crypto Alliance, has previously noted that the delistings triggered by MiCA have sparked extensive debate within the industry.

Many industry observers have raised concerns about compliance issues stemming from MiCA’s failure to address critical sectors, such as cryptocurrency staking and other emerging areas. This lack of clarity has left many stakeholders uncertain about the future of their operations under the new regulatory framework.

Monitoring Market Developments

In light of these developments, a spokesperson for ESMA stated, “ESMA and National Competent Authorities are closely monitoring market developments continuously to ensure an orderly transition to the MiCA regime.” This commitment to oversight underscores the importance of regulatory compliance as the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve.

As the industry navigates these changes, it is crucial for all participants to stay informed and adapt to the shifting regulatory environment. The ongoing discussions surrounding MiCA compliance will undoubtedly shape the future of stablecoins and their role in the broader cryptocurrency market.

For more detailed information, you can read the original article here.