US Stops Sharing Air Quality Data: A Global Concern

NEW DELHI (AP) — In a shocking move, the U.S. government has announced it will discontinue sharing air quality data collected from its embassies and consulates. This decision has raised significant concerns among scientists and public health experts worldwide, who argue that this data is essential for monitoring global air quality and safeguarding public health.

Impact of the Decision on Global Air Quality Monitoring

In response to an inquiry from The Associated Press, the State Department confirmed on Wednesday that its air quality monitoring program would no longer transmit vital air pollution data to the Environmental Protection Agency’s AirNow app and other platforms. This app has been instrumental in allowing Americans and global citizens to access and analyze air quality data in cities around the world.

The cessation of data sharing was attributed to “funding constraints that have caused the Department to turn off the underlying network,” according to the statement. However, embassies and consulates have been instructed to keep their air quality monitors operational, with the possibility of resuming data sharing if funding is restored in the future.

Funding Cuts Under the Trump Administration

This fiscal cut, first reported by the New York Times, is part of a broader trend under President Donald Trump’s administration, which has deprioritized environmental and climate initiatives. The U.S. air quality monitors have been crucial in measuring dangerous fine particulate matter, known as PM2.5, which can penetrate deep into the lungs and lead to severe health issues, including respiratory diseases, heart conditions, and premature death.

The World Health Organization estimates that air pollution is responsible for approximately 7 million deaths each year. The recent announcement regarding the halt in data sharing has prompted immediate backlash from the scientific community, who emphasize the reliability of this data in global air quality monitoring.

Experts React to the Data Sharing Suspension

Bhargav Krishna, an air pollution expert at the Sustainable Futures Collaborative in New Delhi, expressed that the loss of this data is “a big blow” to air quality research. He stated, “They were part of a handful of sensors in many developing countries and served as a reference for understanding what air quality was like. They were also seen to be a well-calibrated and unbiased source of data to cross-check local data if there were concerns about quality.”

Similarly, Alejandro Piracoca Mayorga, a freelance air quality consultant based in Bogota, lamented the loss of this critical information. U.S. embassies and consulates in cities like Lima, Sao Paulo, and Bogota have been providing public air monitoring data, which has been invaluable for independent assessments of air quality.

Consequences for Vulnerable Populations

Khalid Khan, an environmental expert and advocate from Pakistan, echoed these sentiments, stating that the shutdown of air quality monitoring will “have significant consequences.” He highlighted that the monitors in Peshawar, one of the most polluted cities globally, provided crucial real-time data that informed policymakers, researchers, and the public about health decisions.

“Their removal means a critical gap in environmental monitoring, leaving residents without accurate information on hazardous air conditions,” Khan added. He emphasized that vulnerable populations in Pakistan and around the world are particularly at risk, as they often lack access to other reliable data sources.

Global Reach of the Air Quality Monitoring Program

In Africa, the U.S. air quality monitoring program has provided essential data for over a dozen countries, contributing to a better understanding of air pollution levels and their impacts on public health. The discontinuation of this program raises alarms about the future of air quality monitoring and public health initiatives globally.

As scientists and experts continue to voice their concerns, the implications of this decision could resonate far beyond U.S. borders, affecting air quality research and public health efforts worldwide. The call for reinstating this vital data sharing is growing louder, as the need for accurate air quality information becomes increasingly critical in the fight against air pollution.

For more details, visit the original article here.